A trademark is more than just a logo or a name – it is the foundation of a company’s identity. It allows consumers to distinguish an original product from counterfeits, and businesses build their reputation around it. Unfortunately, trademark infringements are becoming increasingly common, both in traditional commerce and online.
Trademark infringement is a serious threat to any brand. In this article, we explain how to recognize infringement, its consequences, and how to effectively protect your trademark rights. We also present real examples and key legal mechanisms such as the trademark protection certificate.
A trademark is any sign that allows distinguishing goods or services of one company from those of others. It can be a name, logo, slogan, or even a color or sound.
A trademark can include practically anything that enables brand identification – from a standard logo to unusual colors or spatial arrangements of products. The requirement, however, is that the sign must be unique and not misleading to consumers.
To legally protect a trademark, it must be registered, for example at the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) or the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
Trademark infringement occurs when a registered sign (name, logo, slogan) or a sign so similar that it can mislead consumers about the origin of goods or services is used without authorization. This may be direct copying or creating similar marks that cause market confusion, resulting in customers confusing products or services of different companies.
Infringement occurs when all three conditions are met simultaneously:
Examples of infringement include:
The American sportswear brand Athleta (a Gap subsidiary) coexisted for years with a company operating the domain Athletica.net. Initially, there was no conflict, but eventually, products and marketing began to resemble each other, causing customer confusion with promotional codes and offers. The court ruled this was trademark infringement in favor of Athleta. The case ended with a settlement. This shows that even long-standing entities may suddenly pose a threat.
The Italian fashion house GUCCI opposed the registration of the trademark GUCIO (a Polish children’s shoe manufacturer). GUCCI argued that GUCIO could benefit from their reputation. The Warsaw Administrative Court eventually ruled that the marks were not similar and that the products targeted different customer groups, so no infringement occurred.
French brand Lacoste opposed the registration of the trademark KAJMAN by a Polish company for leather goods and clothing. The court found the marks
and
conceptually similar and potentially misleading for customers. The registration of KAJMAN was refused for some goods, a decision upheld by court [Judgment of 30.09.2015 (T-364/13)].
Swiss company Rolex SA requested invalidation of a Polish trademark
registered by a Polish company for shutters, blinds, and doors. The court eventually allowed the Polish company to keep its mark because the goods and customers were distinctly different from Rolex watches.
In a case involving air fresheners, the plaintiff claimed infringement of a trademark depicting the iconic tree
. The defendants used a similar shape and sign that could cause consumer confusion and attract them to infringing products. The court confirmed infringement and unjust enrichment [Judgment of the Katowice Court of Appeal of 6 May 2015, ref. V ACa 763/14]. The trademark owner also sued Balenciaga in the USA over similar products
, with a settlement reached in 2019.
In one case, after terminating a promotion contract, the defendant continued using the plaintiff’s word-and-graphic trademark and nickname to mark their products without consent. The court found trademark infringement and awarded damages for lost earnings [Judgment of the Kraków Court of Appeal of 27 November 2017, ref. I ACa 273/17].
Trademark infringement carries severe legal and financial consequences, both civil and criminal.
Possible consequences include:
Claims arising from infringement of trademark protection rights are subject to limitation periods as set in the Polish Industrial Property Law.
This means that even if the rights holder was unaware of the infringement, after 5 years from the infringement date, the claim expires.
In cases of repeated or continuous infringement (e.g., prolonged marketing of goods bearing counterfeit marks), each day of infringement is treated separately. The five-year limitation period runs from each day the infringement occurred. This benefits the rights holder, allowing claims for infringements over an extended time, but only for the non-time-barred period.
After expiry of the limitation period, the infringer can raise the limitation defense leading to dismissal of the claim. Limitation applies to claims for cessation, damages, or disgorgement of profits.
Professional legal advice helps avoid costly mistakes and effectively defend trademarks against infringement.
Trademark infringement is a real risk for any company building its brand. Effective protection requires trademark registration, market monitoring, and prompt action against unauthorized use. In case of infringement, it is advisable to use the services of a patent law firm. A trademark attorney will take care of your interests and guide you through the entire claims enforcement procedure.
Prevent infringement of your trademark with the support of a patent attorney! Our IP law firm handles disputes concerning registered trademark rights infringement. Ask us about our services.